Spoiler alert!
Suzy, do you know anything about...witches?
One is at a loss where to start really; what is there to say
about Dario Argento’s SUSPIRIA? Well , first time I saw it, on video, late one
Saturday night, snuggled up on the sofa back in the 80’s, I was reduced to a
trembling wreck as I struggled in vain to process the episodes of mind-bending
terror this film revels in. The second time I saw it, however, last year at the
Auckland film festival, watching a restored
print, I may have guffawed unwillingly, and, possibly, once or twice, it may
have actually been willingly. Despite the blood-curdling warning splashed across the poster – the only thing
more terrifying than the last 12 minutes of this film…are the first 92 minutes –
this is not a film that has aged terribly well; but despite this, and like many
of the films I’m enjoying at the moment, the film is noted for many of its stylistic
flourishes and has much to recommend it.
Directed by Italian director of gore-drenched thrillers
Dario Argento and released at the cinema in 1977, the film follows American
ballet student Suzy Bannion, played by Jessica Harper, as she experiences
terrifying goings-on at a prestigious dance company in Freiburg, Germany. As far as the plot goes, that’s more or less it,
because very little of what comes next makes any sense – what you get
instead is an eerily stylised, garishly realised, surreal, unrelenting blood-drenched
horror film in which various young dancers are decapitated in increasingly
unlikely ways, falling prey to Argento’s misogynistic delight in brutally dispatching
his young actresses (a predilection that largely reached its apotheosis, or
possibly its nadir, in his 1996 thriller The Stendhal Syndrome which features a
graphic rape scene in which the unfortunate victim is played by his daughter
Asia) until it is revealed that the dance studio is, in fact, controlled by a
coven of witches up to no good with diabolic intentions.
Visually the film is stunning – apparently shot in technicolour
with an anamorphic lenses (the cinematographic technique of shooting
a wide screen picture
on standard 35 mm film stock), the production design and
cinematography emphasise vivid primary colours, particularly red, creating a
deliberately unrealistic, nightmarish setting, emphasised by the use of
imbibition Technicolor prints. Think of the kind of colour you got in films
like The Wizard of Oz, Robin Hood (the version with Errol Flynn and Olivia de Havilland
and not Kevin Costner, or does that go without saying?) and Gone with the Wind,
now imagine it turned up to 11, drenching the film in a palette of green and
red, enhancing the nightmarish quality of the film. These visual flourishes are
echoed elsewhere within the film, either intentionally or unintentionally, with
the use of sound, the soundtrack in particular, and editing techniques, so that
at times the film threatens to overwhelm the senses (always worth looking for
in a film when you’re high, I think). Argento’s directing technique, throwing
around shock cuts, coloured lights and peculiar camera angles are disorientating;
the soundtrack, provided by cult Italian prog band Goblin, throbs with
malign menace, and even the dialogue has ability to create a profound
feeling of unease, following the practise common to Italian film making at the
time of not properly recording the actor’s voices, but dubbing them in later,
resulting in an unsettling sense of dislocation (apparently this was done
because the international cast each spoke their lines in their native
language – English, Italian or German - and responded to each other as if they’d
understood what each other was saying). The overall effect of the film is one
of having the senses battered on almost every level, amplified to an almost
absurd, hallucinatory degree by the insanely violent deaths inflicted upon the
cast in a sustained series of gloriously realised set-pieces.
A young lady peers out a window into the dark, only to
suddenly realise that a pair of eyes are staring back. An arm smashes through one
window pane, suffocates her against the other with a gloved hand and, with her
friend drumming hysterically against the locked door, the owner of the gloved
hand repeatedly stabs the girl in hyper-real close-up before graphically disemboweling
her. He then ties her legs with rope and in the next shot we cut to the friend
running into the lobby of the apartment building for help; she looks up towards
a stained glass ceiling to see the victim's head crashes through it in a hail
of glass shards followed by her body. We cut to the blood drenched corpse,
suspended by the rope dripping blood onto the floor, finally Argento pans the
camera to reveal his next horror. The falling glass has pinned the friend to
the ground crucifix like, the largest sliver having split her face in half.
That’s the first 13 minutes of Suspiria, that is, and it kind of knocks you
senseless. Argento, however, is the
master of sustained horror – this, it turns out, is just the warm up for what’s
to follow. In a particularly sadistic sequence, Suzy’s scantily-clad room-mate
Sarah is chased to the attic by an unseen pursuer; thinking to escape him by
climbing through a window into another room, she falls into a huge pile of
razor wire which entangles her in vicious coils from which she struggles in
anguish to escape, working herself deeper and deeper into the seemingly endless
barbs. From out of nowhere, the mysterious black-gloved hand of a dark figure
appears and slits her throat. First time I saw this scene, I recoiled in horror
at the images on the screen, unable to cope with the level of violence I was
seeing (or, as we called it in those days, ‘I hid behind my hands’). Last time
I saw it my thoughts ran more along the lines of: “Oh, no, she’s fallen into a room full of razor wire, how awful, just when
she needed to escape…hang on, why is there a room full of razor wire in the
attic of a dance academy and how comes she just fell into it? Surely, sir, you stretch my incredulity
too far…and where’d that hand with the knife come from?”, and that was
pretty much it as far as mind-bending terror went for the rest of the film.
Indeed – the only thing more comical than the first 92 minutes of Suspiria…are
the last twelve minutes; in which Suzy discovers a hidden passage; observes the
staff of the school forming a ritual in which they plot her death, and
discovers Sarah's body nailed to a coffin. You can imagine her fright when a
little later the ghostly embodiment of the Black Witch Queen orders Sarah's corpse
to rise from the dead to murder Suzy, resulting in Suzy having to stab her
through the throat with something handy and sharp which luckily not only appears
to kill her (what with her being disembodied and all, she nevertheless fades
from view screaming) but also does for Sarah's reanimated corpse as well, while
also causing the building to set alight, destroying the academy with the coven
inside. And I haven’t even mentioned the academy’s blind pianist having his throat
ripped out by his own guide dog (or sock puppet – at times it’s hard to tell),
or the infamous scene with the maggots yet. The end. With no explanation or
tying up of loose ends, although, in one of my favourite scenes earlier on in
the film, Suzy meets one of Sarah's acquaintances, a dashing psychiatrist who
explains in a frankly torturous bit of exposition that the academy was founded
some 200 hundred ago by Helena Markos, a cruel Greek émigré who was widely
believed to be a witch, although what with him being a believer in the material
world, and a psychiatrist to boot, he really couldn’t be doing with that sort
of thing at all. His companion, however, a white-haired professor of the Van
Helsing school of ‘scepticism is the
natural reaction to witchcraft these days, but magic is ever present’
variety, concludes with bit of exposition of his own regarding witchcraft and
its unnatural goings-on before helpfully adding that a coven cannot survive
without their queen. What makes the scene so striking is that it’s filmed
outside on an incredibly bright (and seemingly breezy) day (their hair is all
over the place but they struggle on bravely), on the plaza of an ultra-modern white
office block that works in startling contrast to the lurid claustrophobia of
the academy.
So – what’s good about it then? Well, all of the above actually,
despite those observations that may have you think otherwise. I’m no fan of
slasher movies, me, but in Suspiria, Argento’s use of bold, very fake-looking
sets, stark lines, primary colours, distorted camera angles and freaked-out
sound creates a world that is uniquely his own. And speaking of freaked-out
sounds, no discussion of Suspiria is complete without mention of the
soundtrack, created by Italian prog rock band Goblin in collaboration with
Argento himself. As one commentator has noted, it sounds as though Hell's
demons rented a studio and decided to jam. Screams, wailings, hissing steam and
some kind of diabolical didgeridoo are punctuated with the occasional distorted
shriek of "Witch!". It's enough to loosen the bowels on its own. It's
reported that while filming, Argento blasted
Goblin's supremely menacing score to create a feeling of unease in the actors
that would ultimately carry over into the psyche of the audience. It’s a monument
to tension and suspense, a near experimental collage of whispers, sighs, and
various other sounds placed against the backdrop of shivering strings and
throbbing bass; Goblin's contribution is as essential to the film's impact as Argento's stylistic and
unflinching direction. In fact, Goblin-esque has become a by-word for a particular type of malignant, sinister orchestration. The titular theme, a melodic composition that recalls a
childhood lullaby hummed along to by someone with a special fondness for sharp
knives and knitting needles, is one of the most effective and unforgettable
tunes in horror history. I think it was even released as a single in 1977
though unsurprisingly I’ve never been able to find a chart position for it, if,
indeed it ever had one.
Last year I was lucky enough to hear the reformed band
perform the soundtrack live as they accompanied the film at the Auckland Film
Festival – one of only three shows they performed that year. They captured the
gleeful malevolence of the original score, complete with creepy whispered there’s-something-nasty-in-the-nursery
la-la-la-ings, howling vocalisations,
celesta and bells, ritualistic drumming, fat synthesisers and, it must be admitted,
some fairly funky crazed prog-rock jazz noodlings, all of it entirely un-nerving.
They received a standing ovation, of course; despite the disturbing subject
matter, you could feel the love in the air, and everyone felt as if we’d just
watched something special. The score is as enjoyable removed from the movie as
it is attached. Suspiria is quite an achievement, as a scary soundtrack and as
a vibe-heavy rock album. That being said, I’ve always been reluctant to include
any of it in a Mind De-Coder radio show because the last thing I want to do for
someone 'midst an otherwise enjoyable trip is to play something as downright creepy as this. God alone
knows what you’d see creeping out of the shadows.
Finally, it’s a good name, isn’t it, SUSPIRIA,? It contains
within its sound all the sibilant menace of ‘suspense’,
‘suspicion’, and ‘hysteria’ combined with an edge of raw
terror. Strange, then, that it should merely be the Italian word for ‘sigh’. Strano, eh? Ma il film non avrebbe mai avuto la stessa emozione viscerale se fosse essere chiamato Sigh, don't you think? I heard somewhere that there was going to be a remake but thankfully common sense prevailed; this is not a film that can be topped - it is what it is, for good or bad, and you very much have to take it or leave it on its own terms. On a lighter note, I read how there's a Japanese restaurant called Cambiare inspired by Suspiria's art designs which would make for a fab night out.
The trailer below is less
the original trailer and more of a four-minute summation of the entire film.
For some that may be enough, but for a film that engages all of the senses,
SUSPIRIA works as a good night in snuggled up on the sofa (with the curtains
drawn obviously) – and I will never forget that first time I saw it. What a
difference 29 years makes though, eh?
No comments:
Post a Comment